Nick Hardt vs Filip Jeff Planinsek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Strength: Planinsek has been more successful on their second serve, winning 44.26% of points in recent months, compared to Hardt’s 39.67%. Could this provide a competitive advantage?
• Effective Return Games: While Planinsek captures 48.79% of points from second serve returns, Hardt achieves 46.18%. However, Hardt leads in first serve returns at 32.6%, far ahead of Planinsek’s 22.51%.
• Pressure Handling: A critical factor under pressure is breakpoint saving ability, with Planinsek managing 59.09% while Hardt manages 46.59%—potentially pivotal in close matches.
• Yearly Match Success: In the past year, Planinsek has shown a winning edge with 60% victories compared to Hardt’s 44.12%.
• Surface Preference: Both players excel on clay, with Hardt slightly stronger at 61% compared to Planinsek’s 57%—an important consideration for clay court events.
• Event Level Competition: Planinsek boasts a 69.7% win rate at $10K Futures/ITF tournaments, whereas Hardt holds 64.29%. Does Planinsek’s experience reflect their overall form?
• Opponent Quality: Hardt has consistently faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 292.06, compared to Planinsek’s 478.93—possibly indicating tougher competitive exposure.
• Performance in Deciding Sets: Planinsek dominates deciding sets at 60%, while Hardt lags significantly at 11%—a crucial element in tight contests.
• Break Point Conversion: Hardt edges slightly ahead in break point conversion at 38.6%, surpassing Planinsek’s 37.93%—useful for seizing critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (July 4, 2025, UTC):

Both players display strengths that could sway the match in their favor. Planinsek's superior second serve performance and breakpoint-saving ability hint at resilience in service games, potentially delivering an edge under pressure.

Conversely, Hardt exhibits a strong return game, particularly against first serves, which might disrupt Planinsek's rhythm. However, his lower performance in critical, deciding sets could be a vulnerability.

Considering the players' records, Planinsek showcases a higher overall match win rate over the past year. This, combined with his composure in clutch situations, suggests he is slightly more prepared to secure victory.

Taking all factors into account, including surface preferences and opponent quality, Planinsek emerges as the likely favorite to win this upcoming match.